Connect with your Union.  Go to 7102 Contacts/Email to find out how.  
 Local meetings are now at 6:30 PM (time change) on the 2nd Thursday of each month..
Principal Financial Group has assisted our members with questions on pensions and reitrement. Feel free to take advantage of their services.
 See how to contact them in our  Resource Info section

 
Expanded links to CL Benefits & Services in our Resource Info section. 
We have all the links to what you may need.  They are right here when you need them.

Medicare choices made simple. Find a link to VIA Benefits in our Resource section
Via Benefits helps you choose the medical, prescription drug
and vision plans that fit your medical requirements and budget.
Click here to learn more about this program.

Looking to learn about the Democrats who have entered the race to become the 2020 Democratic Presidentual Nominee?
Cleck here to see the list and their web site links.


Find out more about all the presidentual candidates


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Nancy Pelosi Buries Historic Labor Bill

               to Appease Centrists


For the first time in decades, the House of Representatives has a rare chance to rewrite American labor laws, in ways that would actually help workers. Among other benefits, a new bill would abolish right-to-work laws that cripple union organizing, create penalties for employers that punish workers for organizing, and set out rules to eliminate delays in negotiating union contracts.

The bill, the Protecting the Right to Organize Act (PRO), was introduced by Rep. Bobby Scott, D-Va., and has 215 co-sponsors. It passed the House Committee on Education and Labor in late September. Rep. Pramila Jayapal, D-Wash., told the Intercept that “it is taking longer than it should” to pass PRO, “given the number of co-sponsors that we have. Many other bills have come to the floor with fewer co-sponsors than this one.”

So why hasn’t Nancy Pelosi brought it to the floor for a vote? And why is she instead focusing on a trade bill that’s a high priority for Donald Trump?

The U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) is a replacement for the North American Free Trade Agreement, which removed tariffs and other restrictions on trade among the three countries, but also caused significant job losses and led companies to move their operations overseas.

Pelosi, Cohen suggests, may be focusing on USMCA instead of PRO because she’s following the demands of centrist Democrats eager to prove that they can work with the president. Those moderates believe that passing USMCA would help protect House Democrats who flipped Republican seats in 2018. It’s an argument also advanced by Cheri Bustos, D-Ill., chair of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee.

Last week, The Washington Post reported that Jesús Seade, Mexico’s undersecretary for North America, said the agreement had a good chance of being finalized this week. That’s also what Pelosi wants, although Democrats, the Post reports, want “changes that would ensure enforcement of the agreement in a way that would help American workers and prevent further outsourcing of U.S. jobs overseas.”

It’s unclear whether any of those changes would satisfy unions, whose support Democrats still depend on. Richard Trumka, the head of the AFL-CIO, has pushed the Democrats to hold out for more labor protections. According to the Post, “his endorsement would be likely to sway dozens of House Democrats to support the new deal.”


According to an earlier Intercept article by Ryan Grim, Rep. Richard Neal, D-Mass., chair of the Ways and Means Committee, agrees with Bustos, but goes a step further, advocating what Grim calls “a divide and conquer strategy,” adding pension reform to the USMCA deal, a decision that could split union support, and, as Grim puts it, “allow House leaders to say that labor is divided on the question, so the party might as well vote yes [on USMCA].”

Cohen’s own reporting suggests that union support for the NAFTA replacement is far from guaranteed. She writes: “Unions have made clear … that from their perspective, USMCA lacks real labor enforcement mechanisms, which could undermine the whole deal, further drag down wages, and eliminate more jobs.”

Dan Mauer, director of government affairs for the Communications Workers of America, which supports PRO, told the Intercept that “We get it’s hard, there’s a lot of stuff on people’s plates, and at the same time, this bill already has a lot of demonstrated support.” CWA members, Maurer said, would be “very unhappy” if the House failed to make progress on the bill.

Aside from the ample number of co-sponsors, the bill has growing public support for unions. Organizations like nonprofits and digital media companies are beginning to form unions. According to a Gallup poll released just before Labor Day, 64% of Americans support organized labor, a near fifty year high.
Ilana Novick
Blogger / Editorial Assistant

STRONG!



15 CWAers from 11 different locals across CWA District 7 participated in a CWA STRONG internal organizing training in Denver, Colo. CWA Local 7050 helped lead a discussion on building a culture of organizing and mobilizing in our locals and the led the participants in a mock new employee orientation.




Click to connect to the Iowa Federation of Labor





 
Our Mission: 
To be the best site to find the latest information on matters that effect our members. 
Copyright © 1997-2019 CWA Local 7102  All rights reserved. 
Copyright, disclaimer and legal information.
                          Direct technical issues regarding this site to the Webmaster.